The fog of war, a long 2003 interview of Robert S McNamara, shows that how one frames an issue has an influence on how a question can be solved. As soon as they got engaged in Vietnam, the US presented the conflict as a fight between freedom and communism. This happened in the late fifties, after China had become communist and right after the Korean war, in a context in which the communist world seemed to progress inexorably. The domino theory, introduced by the Republican US president Eisenhower in 1954, stated that once a country fell and became communist, neighboring countries also would. Hence it became crucial to defend any country facing a communist insurgency. As David Halberstam mentions in his book “The best and the brightest”, the US national context also played a role later in the Vietnam process: Harry Truman, Eisenhower’s Democratic predecessor, was accused during the cold war to have “lost” China in 1949 and to have been weak against the communists, particularly during the Mccarthyst period. A longstanding reputation of “Democratic weakness” persists to this day as a result. In the early 60s, the democrats were still traumatized by these accusations that were systematically used by their Republican adversaries. This is the initial cognitive frame with which the Vietnam question was analyzed by President Kennedy’s administration. Right from the beginning then, the administration was prisoner, without being aware of it, from a frame that was in effect imposed by their adversaries. Despite their doubts and mounting skepticism, they would remain unable, right until the very end, to get rid of it.
Our new book:
Keywords
23andMe analysis of competing hypotheses black swan China CIA clayton christensen competitive intelligence crafting strategy decision making demography disruption Ernest R May Forbes Forecast forecasting Geopolitics Geostrategy Graham T. Allison Hedge funds Integrated Strategy intelligence Intelligence Analysis Kodak Nassim taleb non-linearity non-predictive strategy nonlinear systems non market forces organizational decline Peter F. Drucker prediction Richard E Neustadt Richard Neustadt Social construction strategic autism strategic surprise strategy strategy making Tactics technology Tetlock uncertainty Use of analogs Use of history USSRFollow us on Twitter
- Rachel Marsden: Fogle fiasco underscores America's intelligence problem fb.me/Dv8DIJKj 3 days ago
- Fogle fiasco underscores America's intelligence problem latimes.com/news/opinion/s… 3 days ago
- Cuban missile crisis showed that having a lot of data is of no help if hypotheses are wrong to start with onforb.es/RP1NlO 4 days ago
- RT @nntaleb: Someone asked me: "How can we improve the risk management profession". Answer: "By leaving it". 4 days ago
- Check out our brand new site for the book: fb.me/1Z9wPkptQ 4 days ago
- Constructing Cassandra available for pre-order on Amazon wp.me/p3uEeR-k 4 days ago
- Is Your Company Heading For a Cuban Missile Crisis? Steps to Make Sure Big Data is Working For You, Not Against You onforb.es/RP1NlO 4 days ago
- Roberta Wohlstetter has shown long ago that having tons of data didn't help anticipating surprises #bigdata #ConstructingCassandra 6 days ago
Archives
Silberzahn Jones

